Volume 59, Issue 2 p. 169-178
Original Article

Density-dependent immigration promotes population stability in a long-distance migratory bird

Scott Wilson

Corresponding Author

Scott Wilson

Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, 1125 Colonel by Drive, K1A 0H3 Ottawa, ON, Canada

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Ann E. McKellar

Ann E. McKellar

Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Prairie and Northern Wildlife Research Centre, 115 Perimeter Road, S7N 0X4 Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew W. Reudink

Matthew W. Reudink

Department of Biological Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, V2C 0C8 Kamloops, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Peter P. Marra

Peter P. Marra

Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, 20013-7012 Washington, DC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Laurene M. Ratcliffe

Laurene M. Ratcliffe

Department of Biology, Queen's University, K7L 3N6 Kingston, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 June 2017
Citations: 12

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10144-017-0582-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

The spatial structure of populations determines the relative importance of reproduction, survival and movement on population dynamics. However, the mechanisms by which local individuals and immigrants interact and the subsequent effects of immigrants on productivity are poorly known. We developed an integrated population model (IPM) to study the extent and consequences of immigration on the dynamics of a neotropical migrant (American redstart, Setophaga ruticilla) over an 11-year period in Ontario, Canada. New immigrants represented the majority of the study population each year with higher immigration rates for males than females and for first-year breeders than breeders in their second year or older. Immigration was negatively density dependent, with immigrants replacing previously established breeders in a compensatory manner following their death or emigration. Because of the tradeoff between immigration and apparent survival, neither had a strong influence on population growth and reproductive output was most strongly correlated with a change in abundance between years. However, if immigration ceased, the study population would become locally extinct within 7 years and thus immigrants were essential for local population persistence. We found no evidence for reduced breeding success when immigrants represented a higher proportion of the study population. Our research highlights the importance of movement in the stability of open populations and the strong correlation between the fates of local breeders and the number of immigrants entering the population. We recommend the use of IPMs to address the spatial scale over which immigration occurs and how different scales influence its contribution to population dynamics.